• De Esser For Garageband
• De Esser For Garageband Download Free
• De Esser Download Audacity
• De Esser For Audacity
• Free De Essers

In this tutorial we explore three methods for de-essing vocals in FL Studio using the tools supplied.

Dec 24, 2018  Hi! I'm in search of a free de-esser plugin for my Mac running High Sierra and Cubase AI 9.5. I've tried installing the de-essers I know of (Lisp, Spitfish, MDA De-Esser), but all are 32-bit according to Cubase's VST manager. I can't seem to find any 64-b. De-Esser is compatible with: Adobe Premiere Pro, Apple Final Cut Pro, Avid Pro Tools, Apple Logic Pro, Audacity, Adobe Audition, DaVinci Resolve, Avid Media Composer, Apple GarageBand.and many more.

• De-esser plugin for vocals The free Spitfish de-esser VST plugin by Digital Fish Phones is an easy to use de-esser effect, aimed mainly at vocal tracks (mono or stereo). Just like the classic analog hardware de-essers, the Spitfish de-esser dynamically filters out harsh, annoying s-like sounds that would otherwise 'spit' in your face.
• De-Essing Options in FL Studio In this tutorial we explore three methods for de-essing vocals in FL Studio using the tools supplied. Most good de-essers are simply band-limited compressors repackaged and labelled so they can be called a 'de-esser'.
• Apr 07, 2019 Do you want the Best DeEsser Plugin Software to eliminate the harsh “ess” or “shh” sounds in the audio world then, you’re in the right place. In this guide, I have listed the best de-esser plugin software on the market today. Before jumping to the list lets see what is De-Esser and features in brief.

Most good de-essers are simply band-limited compressors repackaged and labelled so they can be called a 'de-esser'. So if you have a multi-band compressor, you have a de-esser.

There are two main modes you may want to de-ess in, peaking (a narrow-band) or shelving (starting at a given frequency and upward). Both the Fruity Multiband Compressor and Maximus can operate in either mode. Use the Mid band for peaking or High band for shelving.

We use a multi-band compressor to de-ess because we want to limit the loudness of specific frequencies, usually between 4,000~12,000 Hz. This is where all the 'sibilant' sound energy lies. Further, we only want to compress the sibilant frequencies where they occur. So what's wrong with an EQ? The problem there is that you cut the same frequencies across the whole track and often make it sound dull. Compression, with the correct threshold and ratio settings, cuts the sibilants only when they exceed an acceptable level.

If you want to see the best example of a voiceover that needs some serious de-essing check this YouTube video 'Soundproofing / Noise Reduction Tips: Sound Decibels & Frequency by Audimute'. Don't you just want to de-ess that one :)

Enjoy.

The human voice is a wonderfully complex instrument. A typical sentence — whether its spoken or sung, is actually composed of several sonic components, some generated in the lungs and chest cavity, others a result of the resonance of the larynx (which we also refer to as our “voice box”), and even more that occur higher up in the anatomy (think tongue, lips, etc.)

When recording the human voice, it’s essential to be mindful of how each of these components is working together. Some microphones do a better job of capturing and reproducing the rich, full, low frequencies of a voice, others are airy, silky, and articulate.

Context is everything, of course, and whereas one of my favorite microphones, the AKG C414 XLII works like a dream on certain singers, I’ve found it to be overly “bright” on other performers. When I say bright, I’m referring to how the microphone reproduces high frequencies, specifically, “esses”.

Esses can be generated by a human voice when the tongue is placed on the upper palate, directly behind the top teeth. When air is generated and passes through, the resulting sound consists of mostly high frequencies. Different voices have different tendencies, and combining a vocalist who generates an abundance of high frequencies with a microphone that was designed with an emphasis on capturing these same frequencies can result in a displeasing sound.

Ideally, the recording engineer will get it right at the source, but in some cases, the mix engineer simply has to make do with what they’ve been provided — moreover, with modern music production and mixing aesthetics tending to call for liberal usage of compression, saturation, and additive EQ (especially in the high frequencies), sibilance can quickly become a problem.

There isn’t a singular solution to this issue, but a “de-esser” is one of the most common tools used to tame harshness in vocals. Traditionally, a de-esser works as a compressor that has been fed an EQ boost via a sidechain, making it more responsive to the frequency range at which the EQ boost has been applied. Once the de-esser detects that the amplitude has surpassed a set threshold, attenuation occurs.

Beneath is a breakdown of some of the terminology you’ll typically find on a de-esser and a roundup of my favorite plugins used for de-essing. I want to be careful to clarify that not all of these are designed specifically for the task of de-essing, but plugins have come such a long way in a short time, and several of these handle sibilance brilliantly.

De-Esser Controls and Terminology

Threshold

Much like the threshold control on a compressor, this determines the point at which the processing takes place. Once the amplitude of the signal “crosses” the threshold, de-essing will occur.

Range

This determines how much de-essing will take place once the amplitude crosses the threshold. Lower values may sound more subtle and natural but might not do the job entirely. Higher values can create undesired artifacts and sometimes leave the vocalist sounding “lispy”

Lookahead

This feature allows the de-esser to predict incoming sibilance by “looking ahead” a certain amount of milliseconds. For rapid-fire vocal performances, this might be a useful feature to handle sibilance. I’ve found lookahead to be helpful when mixing several Hip-Hop projects.

Wide vs. Split-band

Wide-band is great for general de-essing tasks and is a great starting point. It will attenuate all areas of the frequency spectrum evenly. Split-band will attenuate a smaller range of the frequency spectrum, generally the high frequencies where sibilance occurs. I suggest experimenting with both when mixing, and discovering which works best for the specific performance.

Some de-essers feature a function that allows you to hear only what the processor is doing, which can be helpful for determining if the de-esser is working at the correct area of the frequency spectrum. This function is sometimes identified as “audition”, “delta”, or “monitor”.

Additionally, certain de-essers allow you to choose at which frequency range the sidechain EQ boost is applied, so keep an eye out for this control, which is sometimes named differently depending on which plugin you’re using.

1. oeksound soothe

oeksound defines soothe as “a dynamic equalizer with self-adjusting bands”. It behaves similarly to a de-esser in that if it detects an overabundance of content at a certain area of the frequency spectrum, it attenuates it. It has a colorful, easy-to-understand user interface, and is among the best plugins I’ve ever used for taming harshness of all kinds.

What makes soothe so special is the amount of control it gives one over the process of attenuating unwanted frequencies. One can use up to five bands of dynamic equalization—with frequency, bandwidth and sensitivity controls per band, and global depth, sharpness and selectivity controls. Soothe can work with pinpoint precision, or handle more broad-stroke attenuation tasks.

Mix Tip

Try it at the beginning, middle, or end of your signal chain. There are times when I use soothe as the very first insert on my lead vocal, to handle the removal of harshness before any other processing. Then there are times when multiple stages of saturation, compression, and equalization add some unwanted “sizzle” to vocals, in which case, soothe will be placed closer to the end of that chain.

I employ a multi-buss technique, with all of my vocals ultimately routed to an auxiliary track before reaching the 2-buss, and soothe works well to combat a buildup of unpleasant frequencies at this stage. Lastly, it’s not uncommon for me to use soothe on the 2-buss, as it does a great job of transparently reducing harshness across an entire mix.

2. FabFilter Pro-DS

The transparent sound quality, helpful visual feedback, and versatility of the controls on FabFilter plugins are virtually unmatched, and the Pro-DS is no exception. Despite being an incredibly deep and detailed plugin, loaded with parameters and unique features, I can fix sibilance with the Pro-DS quickly and easily.

The Pro-DS shows you how it’s working via a scrolling waveform that becomes yellow/green when attenuation is required, and a small strip in the lower left corner that indicates exactly where in the frequency spectrum it detects sibilance. It’s details like this that make FabFilter plugins extremely helpful and educational, visually speaking. The different modes, look-ahead and external sidechain options put it a cut above most other de-esser plugins.

Mix Tip

Try it on non-vocal sources. The “all-around” mode and ability to control the stereo linking make the Pro-DS a great option for taming unwanted harshness on cymbals, acoustic guitars with excessive fret noise, and virtually any source that suffers from unpleasant high-frequency content.

3. FabFilter Pro-Q 3

Not technically a de-esser, but with the addition of the dynamic EQ mode, the Pro-Q 3 makes this flagship equalizer from FabFilter even more versatile. Essentially, when this mode is engaged, the Pro-Q 3 applies attenuation only when the plugin detects amplitude at a specific frequency over a set threshold.

For instance, if you’re hoping to tame sibilance in a vocalist, which let’s say hypothetically is most prominent at roughly 8 kHz, but you don’t want to attenuate at that frequency when the singer isn’t singing sibilant lines, this feature would be perfect, as the attenuation would only occur once the singer vocalizes an ess, ch, etc.

Mix Tip

Try the Pro-Q 3 on a vocal buss, or even the 2-buss. This plugin also features a helpful M/S mode, allowing one to process the sides separate from the center, which makes it great for mix buss processing and even mastering. The spectrum analyzer also detects and displays peaks, giving one valuable visual feedback as to where exactly in the frequency spectrum sibilance is occurring.

4. Weiss Deees

The Weiss DS1-MK3 bundle from Softube, which is a line-by-line code port from the highly sought after hardware unit, is a fantastic set of mastering tools. Weiss Deees features two independent bands, in case your program material suffers from sibilance at multiple frequency ranges. Add to that, helpful metering and pristine sound quality, making it one of the best plugin de-essers currently available.

Mix Tip

Use on an individual track or during mastering. As advertised, these are mastering grade tools, so it’s common to place across an entire program, but the Weiss definitely excels when placed on a lone vocal, high-hat, or similarly harsh audio track.

5. UAD Manley VOXBOX

The VOXBOX, an emulation of a beautiful boutique hardware unit from Manley Labs, is designed to be an all-in-one solution to vocal recording and processing. The preamp section is rich and full, the Pultec-style EQ is great for broad-stroke tonal sculpting, and the compressor can go from smooth and transparent, to grabby and aggressive.

Additionally, the plugin has a fantastically simple de-ess section. One can choose at which frequency the de-esser is applied, and set the threshold. Interestingly, setting the frequency control to “LIMIT 10:1” turns the section from a de-esser into a colorful-sounding limiter.

Mix Tip

With the preamp, EQ, and compression section, it’s certainly the most sonically versatile tool on this list. While obviously designed for work on vocals, the VOXBOX works fantastically on pretty much anything including bass, acoustic guitars, and drums. The de-essing section can actually do wonders on brittle acoustic guitars, or overly-crisp high-hats.

6. Pro Tools Dyn3 De-Esser

Sometimes, this thing just works. The bland, gray user interface and lack of fancy controls don’t really deter me from using the Dyn3 when it sounds right. Of the crop of de-essers that came out before plugins started to get really flexible and impressive, I’d choose the Dyn3 as my go-to.

De Esser For Garageband

Mix Tip

Use the “HF ONLY” feature to apply de-essing to frequencies above a certain frequency. I’ve found that the resulting sound (at least on this plugin) is far more natural and transparent.

Additional Tips

One of the tools that I often use for manual de-essing is using clip gain. Mac garageband tutorial. In some cases, sibilant sounds (ss, sh, ch, etc.) can cause compressors, saturators, and exciters to behave erratically, and the resulting sound is even more unpleasant than with no processing applied.

Sometimes I’ll go in and use clip gain to manually de-ess, bringing the sibilant parts of phrases down to taste (generally 1-2 dB). Sibilance is pretty easy to spot in waveforms-due to it being higher in frequency, the waveform for a sibilant passage is”fuzzy” in appearence, (see figures beneath). Because clip gain is pre-any-plugin-processing, I am minimizing a problem before it even starts.

A word with sibilance at the end. Clip gain is used to bring down the sibilance.

I also regularly use parallel processing, especially on vocals. It’s not uncommon for me to have a “smooth” vocal layer with multiple types of processing, a “hot” layer, a “bright” later, etc. To save DSP, I often “commit” these multiple layers to audio. The buildup of sibilance when using this method can be very apparent. When this issue arises, I’ll group the committed audio tracks, make breaks around each sibilant sound, and bring them down to taste by using the clip gain line.

Traditional volume automation, which reduces the track level after any inserts that have been applied is another method I often use to minimize how sibilant lines negatively affect an overall mix. I always perform fader rides when mixing, especially on vocals, so I keep esses in mind, and react accordingly with fader movements when I reach this stage of my mixing process.

To be honest, a mix free of harsh sibilance is a result of a delicate application of several of the aforementioned tools and techniques — careful and deliberate processing with de-essers, subtle use of clip gain and automation, and knowing when you’ve pushed a vocal a bit too far with compression, saturation, etc. are all essential in creating a smooth, intelligible, professional-sounding vocal.

While some may argue that, because of loudness normalization as incorporated by major streaming services, the loudness war has been “won” by those who prefer their music dynamic and natural-sounding, modern productions are still loud and bright compared to musical releases from decades past.

De Esser For Garageband Download Free

De Esser Download Audacity

I still serve clients who want their assets delivered in the -8 LUFS range and to be as perceived as louder than the competition. Because of the aggressive compression, high-frequency boosting, and limiting needed to achieve these results, vocals can often become harsh and fatiguing if not treated with extra care, and subsequently, de-essers are arguably more important than they’ve ever been to modern music makers.

De Esser For Audacity

Free Video on Mixing Low End

Free De Essers

Download a FREE 40-minute tutorial from Matthew Weiss on mixing low end.